The global rise of right-wing populism has presented a complex challenge to established political norms, not least

within the United States. While often associated with nationalist rhetoric and a rejection of globalist agendas, this

movement also reveals internal fractures, particularly concerning issues of identity and international relations. The

resurgence of antisemitic tropes within certain segments of American conservatism, coupled with debates about the U.S.'s

role in supporting Israel, points to a potential realignment of power within the Republican Party and a shift in its

foreign policy orientation. These ideological tensions, while seemingly domestic, have far-reaching consequences for

U.S. foreign policy and its alliances.

The emergence of figures like Ted Cruz and JD Vance, both vying for influence within the conservative movement,

highlights the struggle for the soul of the Republican Party. While Cruz has publicly denounced antisemitism and

positioned himself as a staunch defender of Israel, other voices within the party have been accused of either

downplaying or outright embracing antisemitic sentiments. This divergence reflects a deeper ideological schism regarding

the role of religion, nationalism, and international alliances in shaping conservative political thought. The

perception, whether accurate or not, that certain segments of the right are increasingly receptive to anti-Jewish

rhetoric creates a vulnerability that adversaries could exploit to undermine American influence abroad. The rise of

misinformation, amplified by social media, further complicates efforts to combat antisemitism and foster a more nuanced

understanding of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

The potential impact of this internal struggle on U.S. foreign policy is significant. A Republican Party increasingly

influenced by elements sympathetic to antisemitic narratives could lead to a reassessment of the U.S.-Israel

relationship, potentially weakening a key strategic alliance in the Middle East. This could embolden actors seeking to

destabilize the region and challenge American hegemony. Furthermore, the perception that the U.S. is tolerant of

antisemitism could damage its credibility as a defender of human rights and democratic values on the global stage. The

erosion of these values, perceived or real, would have clear ramifications for America's standing in multilateral

institutions. Considering that the India's global position is increasingly important, particularly in the context of

security and trade, a shift in American foreign policy could compel India to re-evaluate its own strategic partnerships

and alliances.

However, there are also constraints on the extent to which these trends can reshape American foreign policy. The

deep-seated support for Israel within the U.S. political establishment, as well as the strong lobbying efforts of

pro-Israel groups, will likely serve as a check on any radical departures from the status quo. The vast majority of

Republican voters still view Israel favorably, and a candidate openly advocating for anti-Israel policies would likely

face significant opposition. Furthermore, the broader geopolitical context, including the rise of China and the ongoing

conflict in Ukraine, necessitates a degree of continuity in U.S. foreign policy to maintain stability and deter

aggression. World affairs background shows how quickly these relationships evolve.

Ultimately, the internal struggle within American conservatism regarding antisemitism and the future of the Republican

Party represents a complex and multifaceted challenge. While the potential consequences for U.S. foreign policy and its

global standing are significant, there are also countervailing forces that will likely limit the extent of any radical

shifts. The outcome of this struggle will depend on a variety of factors, including the ability of mainstream

conservatives to effectively combat antisemitism, the willingness of political leaders to prioritize national interests

over partisan considerations, and the evolving geopolitical landscape. The U.S.'s ability to navigate these challenges

will be crucial for maintaining its leadership role in the 21st century.