Cameron Green's recent performances in the Ashes series have drawn significant scrutiny, particularly following his

dismissal for just 19 runs in the second innings of the Boxing Day Test. This marked another disappointing outing for

the all-rounder, who has struggled to establish himself in the series with a mere 112 runs at an average of 18. Green’s

batting form is a concern, but his bowling figures are equally troubling, with just three wickets across four matches.

These statistics raise critical questions regarding his selection ahead of other contenders, including Beau Webster.

Ricky Ponting, a former captain and a notable advocate for Green, has expressed concern as well. While he acknowledges

Green's potential, he also implies that selectors might be overly committed to this 'project player.' The rationale

behind retaining Green seems to hinge on the belief that he can turn his form around at the international level, rather

than relegating him to domestic cricket where he could dominate but potentially stagnate in his development.

The Australian selectors face a complex decision. Retaining Green sends a message of confidence in his abilities, but

continued poor performances could exacerbate the pressure on the team as they seek to regain momentum in the series.

Notably, the Australian batting order has been inconsistent, and having a reliable all-rounder could be crucial in

stabilizing the team. However, with Green's current averages of 32 with the bat and 36 with the ball after 36 Tests, the

question arises about the balance between potential and performance.

Ponting believes that the selectors will likely maintain faith in Green due to his all-around capabilities, which

include fast bowling and exceptional fielding. This suggests a preference for retaining a player with potential upside

rather than opting for immediate performance from a less experienced player. However, the insistence on keeping Green in

the squad could impact team dynamics and morale if results do not improve.

The team's recent collapse, which allowed England to secure a four-wicket victory, highlights the need for consistent

contributions from all players. Green's inability to deliver on both fronts—batting and bowling—places additional

pressure on the rest of the lineup and raises concerns about the effectiveness of the current strategy.

As Australia heads into the New Year’s Test in Sydney, the selectors must weigh the long-term benefits of development

against the immediate need for results. Should they opt to retain Green and allow him to work through his struggles, it

may serve as a lesson in patience, but it could also risk further damage to the team's standing in the series.

Conversely, a tactical shift could provide an opportunity for a fresh player to invigorate the squad.

In conclusion, Green's performance trajectory and the selectors' decisions will be pivotal as Australia seeks to rebound

from recent setbacks. The outcome of these decisions will not only impact the ongoing Ashes series but also set a

precedent for how the team manages player development and selection moving forward.